Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate) Compared with other Drugs for Bipolar Seroquel Basics
Seroquel Side Effects
How To Take Seroquel
Comments
Where to Buy Seroquel /
Ratings
How Seroquel Works & Compares
with Other Meds Seroquel for Schizophrenia
Seroquel for Other Disorders
Studies on Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate) for Bipolar Disorder
Keep in mind who sponsors the study, as it will tends to make the results more
favorable for the med in question (on average 3.6 times more likely,
according to a Yale study).
Risperdal vs. Seroquel - This study small, 3-week study was for 19 people
who had to discontinue Risperdal (risperidone) combined with an
anticonvulsant because of sucky side effects.
Eighteen of the 19 completed the study, and 15 of them saw at 50% or better
reduction on their
Young Mania Rating Scale
when taking
Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate) and an anticonvulsant than an anticonvulsant alone,
and 18 out of 19 had a 50% improvement on the the
Clinical Global Impression.
Seroquel vs. unnamed mood stabilizers - Finally, a study lasting longer than
3 weeks! Seriously, most of the studies out there with
Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate) lasted 3, 4 or, at most, 6 frickin' weeks and
used only the
Young Mania Rating Scale
to determine the results. Plus there aren't even that many of them.
The food stinks and the portions are small. At least this study followed
28 people with unreported (in the abstract) forms of bipolar disorder for a
year, comparing flexible dosages of Seroquel with the delightfully named
"classical mood stabilizers." As the study was done it Italy I'll presume
that was a choice of valproic acid or
lithium and at least two hours a day of Vivaldi.
Moods were charted on the
Young Mania Rating Scale,
the
Clinical Global Impression, the
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and
The Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression. The results - everyone
felt better regardless of which med was used. I think it was a combination
of flexible dosages (a big advantage of the antipsychotics) and the Vivaldi
actually.
Seroquel + (lithium or valproate) - Another small study that lasted a good
long time. In this case 18 months. This study picked out 16 people
from a group of 75 veterans with bipolar 1 who were only partially responsive to
lithium or a valproate
of some kind (probably valproic acid, but perhaps
Depakote (divalproex sodium)) and were given
anywhere from 25 to 330mg a day of
Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate). Of those 16, nine were "judged much or
very much improved" on the
Clinical Global Impression scale for bipolar, mainly due to the aspects
where Seroquel totally rules - diminished insomnia, agitation, irritability, and
mood disturbance.
Seroquel as an add-on for rapid cycling 14 people with rapid cycling
were followed for 11 to 20 weeks. At the start of the study they were each
in various states of Bipolarland - Manic, Mixed, Hypomanic, Depressed, whatever.
They were started anywhere between 200 and 800(!)mg a day of Seroquel in
addition to whatever they were taking. By the end of the study most
everyone was taking less, between 75 and 450mg a day. Moods were charted
on the
Young Mania Rating Scale,
the
Clinical Global Impression, and
The Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression. Surprisingly Seroquel
(quetiapine fumarate) wasn't as effective in this study for depression as in
other studies, but given the small size that could be a statistical anomaly as
much as any indication of Seroquel's working differently for people with the
rapid cycling form of bipolar disorder. Otherwise, as one would expect,
giving someone 800mg a day of Seroquel would knock them right into a week-long
sleep where cycling of any kind is either not happening or impossible to feel.
Which may not be that bad of an idea sometimes.
Seroquel for Anxiety in Bipolar & Schizoaffective Disorder in Adolescents -
I generally don't like using studies with kids, because this is not a
kid-oriented site. But I'm desperate for long-term studies. Plus
this is a tiny study, but I'm taking what I can get. Anyway, 10
teenagers with bipolar and schizoaffective disorders took 300-800mg a day of
Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate), but at least they were started at the much saner
50mg a day to start and titrated up to 300mg a day. They were followed for
88 weeks. The
Clinical Global Impression, the
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment of Negative
Symptoms (SANS) rated their symptoms, which improved "significantly."
Everyone gained weight but otherwise chilled out.
Spend $400 a month on Seroquel, not $400 a night on Cocaine - 17 people with
bipolar disorder and problems with cocaine. In addition to the
The Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression,
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the ever-popular
Young Mania Rating Scale,
Seroquel's effects were tested on the Cocaine Craving Questionnaire (CCQ), urine
tests and how much money everyone spent every day or week on coke. The
results - "Dollars spent on cocaine and days/week of cocaine use decreased
non-significantly, and urine drug screens did not change significantly from
baseline to exit." So people were still using, just using less.
You'd have to figure it out for yourself if Seroquel would save you any money.
Oh, all other symptoms were better, so that's something.
Seroquel - better for mood disorders than schizophrenia? - I don't know how
much this one study means, but it certainly explains AstraZeneca's sales reps'
huge push of Seroquel as a bipolar medication while letting all the other atypicals pretty much take over the schizophrenia market. 145 patients at
a non-profit psychiatric hospital in Massachusetts with diagnoses of bipolar
disorder (manic, mixed, or depressive type), major depression with psychotic
features, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder (bipolar or depressive type),
delusional disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) were all treated
with Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate). I guess the average dosage was 300mg
a day, but I'm not sure. Anyway, people with a diagnosis of bipolar
disorder, manic, mixed, or depressed and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type
displayed higher response rates (> 74%) compared with patients with
schizophrenia. "However, this finding did not achieve statistical
significance." Again we get confusing results on the depression issue -
Seroquel didn't do that well for the depressed types in this study.
Then again, it may only work well for the depressive aspects of bipolar
disorder, and not major depressive disorder all that well. See the page on a drugs' efficacy
for an explanation of the tests used to evaluate if a medication is any good or
not. The Overlords of the 12 Zernox Galaxies have compelled me
through messages in the Sunday Chronicle to beg you for your support. So
if this site has been of use and/or amusement to you, visit the
Support Page to find out how you can help.
This includes
reviewing Crazy Meds for Amazon.com and/or
There's also our Mental Mall to
snag some free software or a purchase some books. Better yet,
if you run a business and want to advertise on Crazy Meds, see
our page on ad
rates and policies. I'm all about
fiscal transparency, so follow the money for full
disclosure of my finances. Crazy
Meds Home Crazy
Meds Talk
About Antidepressants
About SSRIs
About Anticonvulsants / Mood Stabilizers
About Atypical Antipsychotics
About Benzodiazepines About Stimulants Finding a Doctor
Sites with More Information
Support Group Sites About
Crazy Meds Crazy Meds: The Blog
Remember: Nobody on this site is a doctor,
therapist, or a pharmacist. Know your sources!
Crazy Meds is not responsible for the content of sites we provide links to.
We like them, but what's on those sites is their business, not ours.
![]()
![]()
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
Check for Drug-Drug Interactions
Schizoaffective Disorder in the News
Hey, did you find this page all by itself through Google or some other search engine? Great! But to really appreciate the entire site, you need to start here.
Take care, and keep taking your crazy meds!
If you still have unanswered questions about this or other medications,
including which one is, or combination of meds are the best for you, your best
bet is to ask on Crazy
Meds Talk. Better yet, if you want to let the world know how they
worked out for you and want to help out others in their quest for the correct
meds, join the party.
If you want to discuss your issues, I suggest checking out one of
the various
support groups online.
Otherwise, if you're letting me know about how much you like or hate the site,
or need to let me know about medication effects in private, then just drop
a note to jerod23 at gmail dot com Honestly, I usually don't have a
lot of time to answer e-mail these days. The snide autoresponse
message that may or may not hit your mailbox is going to tell you the same
thing.
Another problem is that you may not get a response even if I wanted to send you
one. You see, so many dickweeds with malicious intents and too much time
on their hands have appropriated the crazymeds.org domain name to use for their
spam, viruses and the like. Subsequently some lazy-ass e-mail protection
software authors just go by the domain name, and not the IP address. So
I've been blacklisted because of the actions of others. Or the software
just doesn't like the domain name because of the "crazy" and/or "meds." Or
your question about a particular medication will set off spam flags. So
the e-mail just wouldn't go through regardless. Sorry.
Dead tree references:
Instant Psychopharmacology 2nd Edition Ronald J. Diamond M.D. © 2002. Published by W.W. Norton
Essential Psychopharmacology Stephen M. Stahl, M.D., Ph. D. © 2000. Published by Cambridge University Press
Essential Psychopharmacology of Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers Stephen M. Stahl, M.D., Ph. D. © 2002. Published by Cambridge University Press
Essential Psychopharmacology of Depression and Bipolar Disorder Stephen M. Stahl, M.D., Ph. D. © 2001. Published by Cambridge University Press
A Primer of Drug Action Robert M. Julien, M.D., Ph. D. © 2004. I now use the Tenth Edition. Sometimes that comes up on an Amazon search, usually it doesn't. Published by Worth Publishers
Physicians' Desk Reference Editions 53 & 56 Maria Deutsch & Anu Gupta, Drug Information Specialists, et al. © 1999, 2002. Published by Medical Economics Company.
The Complete Guide to Psychiatric Drugs Edward Drummond, M.D. © 2000. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mosby's 2004 Drug Guide David Nissen PharmD, Editor.© 2004. An imprint of Elsevier. The edition we're using isn't listed on Amazon.
End of books used for this article.
Created Saturday, November 20, 2004
Last updated Saturday, May 15, 2010
Copyright © 2003 - 2006 Jerod Poore. All rights reserved.
Almost all of the material on this site is copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 Jerod Poore. Except, of course, the PI sheets, those are the property of the drug companies who developed the drugs the sheets are about. And any documents that are written by other people which may be posted to this site will remain the property of the original authors. You cannot reproduce this page or any other material on this site outside of the boundaries of fair use copying without the express permission of the copyright holder. That's usually me, so just ask first. That means if want to print out a few pages to take to your doctor, therapist, counselor, support group, non-understanding family members or something like that - then that's OK to just do. Go for it! Please. As long as you include this copyright notice and the following disclaimer, I'm cool with it.
All rights reserved. No warranty is expressed or implied in this information. Consult one or more doctors and pharmacists before taking, or changing how you take any neurological and/or psychiatric medication. Your mileage may vary. What happened to us won't necessarily happen to you. Nobody on this site is a doctor, therapist, or a pharmacist. We don't portray them either here or on TV. Only doctors can diagnose and treat an illness. Some doctors tend to get pissed off by patients who know too much about medications, so tread lightly when and where appropriate. Diagnosing yourself from a website is like defending yourself in court, you suddenly have a fool for a doctor. Don't be a cyberchondriac, thinking you have every disease you see a website about, or that you'll get every side effect from every medication. Self-prescribing is just as dangerous. All information on this site has been obtained through personal experience, the experiences of my friends, the experiences of people reported on online support groups, and from sources that are referenced throughout the site. Know your sources! As such the information presented here is not a substitute for real medical advice from your real doctor, just a compliment to it. No neurologists, psychiatrists, therapists or pharmacists were harmed in the production of this website. All brand names of the drugs listed in this site are the trademarks of the companies listed after them in the pages about the drugs, even though those companies may or may not have been acquired by other companies who may or may not be listed in this site by the time you read this. Always read the PI sheet that comes with your medications and never ever throw them away. If you didn't get a PI sheet, demand one. Loudly. Crazy Meds is not responsible for the content of sites we provide links to. We like them, or they're paid advertisements, or they're something you should read to make an informed decision about a particular med. Sometimes they're more than one of those things. But what's on those sites is their business, not ours. Very little information about visitors to this site is collected or saved. And from time to time I do look at search terms used to find it in an effort to make the information I present more relevant. Use only as directed. Void where prohibited.
"Everything is true, nothing is permitted." - Jerod Poore