(redirected from Meds.Keppra-XRExpandedApprovedOffLabel)
‹ Brand and Generic Availability | Keppra-XRPagesIndex | How Long & How Likely To Work, Comparisons with Other Meds ›
Crazy Meds Comprehensive Keppra-XR pages
On this page… (hide)
- 1. Keppra-XR is US FDA-Approved to Treat:
- 2. Keppra-XR (levetiracetam) is Approved Elsewhere for:
- 3. Clinically Significant or Otherwise Common Off-Label Uses of Keppra-XR (levetiracetam):
- 4. When/Why You Should Take Keppra-XR
- 5. When/Why You Should NOT Take Keppra-XR
- 6. Less Common/Experimental Off-Label Uses of Keppra-XR
- 7. Failed Off-Label Uses
- 8. Potentially Dangerous Off-Label Uses
Drugs are officially approved to be used for certain things, and they may be approved for one thing in one country but something else entirely in another.1
Meds are often prescribed for conditions (e.g. Topamax for bipolar disorder), or people (e.g. adolescents being prescribed any SSRI or SNRI except Prozac or Lexapro) they aren’t approved to treat. This is known as off-label prescribing. Some off-label prescribing is so common that lots of people think the medication is a first-line treatment for the condition it’s prescribed to treat (e.g. Trileptal for bipolar disorder). If a drug company’s sales force (a.k.a. pharm reps) is too aggressive in pushing a med for off-label applications where it doesn’t work as well as people think, the FDA will now come down hard on them (e.g. Novartis getting heavily fined for promoting Trileptal as a treatment for bipolar disorder).
Off-label prescribing is not necessarily bad. Drugs that almost, or would almost, pass a clinical trial still work for a lot of people.
1. Keppra-XR is US FDA-Approved to Treat:
- Keppra-XR (Extended Release): as adjunctive therapy (combined with another medication) in the treatment of partial onset seizures in patients 16 years old or older with epilepsy.
- Keppra (immediate release/IR) & oral solution:
- as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial onset seizures in adults and children 4 years old and older with epilepsy.
- as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of myoclonic seizures in adults and adolescents 12 years old and older with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).
- as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in adults and children 6 years of age and older with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
- Injection for Intravenous Use (IV). The same as the IR version, except:
- It’s approved only for people 16 years old and older.
- It’s to be used only if someone isn’t able to take the tablets or drink the vile-tasting grape Keppra-Ade.
- IV Keppra isn’t intended for long-term use, and should be replaced by a tablet or oral solution form as soon as possible.
2. Keppra-XR (levetiracetam) is Approved Elsewhere for:
3. Clinically Significant or Otherwise Common Off-Label Uses of Keppra-XR (levetiracetam):
Boy do we have off label uses! Keppra is like Neurontin, in that it’s being prescribed for practically anything (these guys certainly want to throw it at everything). Unlike Neurontin, it works…but when used for something other than epilepsy it usually needs one thing to work. See if you can figure it out.
- Monotherapy for partial epilepsies.
- Including motor and sensory epilepsia partialis continua (EPC). EPC is one of the scariest and weirdest things to witness or experience.
- Monotherapy for generalized epilepsies, including:
- post-hypoxic and post-encephalic myoclonus
- negative myoclonus
- Various idiopathic (i.e. fuck if the doctors know what caused it, odds are you were born with it and it didn’t pop up until just now) myoclonic, tonic-clonic and/or absence seizures.
- absence seizures - plus a good example of what happens if you suddenly stop taking Keppra, and how Keppra will forgive you and work just as well.
- and the dreaded Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. With a 50% to 100% reduction of certain seizure types along with an increase in the kids’ alertness. Talk about win-win!
- Keppra is also used for seizures and other damage caused by traumatic brain injury, where it’s as good as Dilantin (phenytoin), the gold standard med.
- Keppra is also good for tumor-induced epilepsy.
- It’s really good for tumor-induced epilepsy.
- Including preventing seizures prior to and during surgery.
- And stopping the seizures in children with brain tumors without interfering with any of the chemo and other meds they take.
- And stopping the vomiting caused by chemo along with stopping the seizures.
- Keppra just generally improves the quality of life of people with brain tumor-related epilepsy.
- When you’ve got 75 of 82 patients (91%) seizure free
- and Keppra could actually help prevent some forms of brain cancer from spreading so UCB damn well better be doing more clinical trials for another approved indication! If they don’t want to pay for it some cancer research charity should.
- Naturally enough IV Keppra is used to deal with status epilepticus.
- It works best when used immediately and by itself.
- In case you haven’t cried enough lately, IV Keppra works well for critically ill children who have gone into status. Too bad they still need to keep collecting data one kid at a time to figure out the best way to use it.
- For bipolar disorder Keppra’s best used to deal with the most extreme, out-of-control manias you have around.
- Keppra stops mania fast, like an antipsychotic.
- Either as an add-on medication
- or all by itself.
- It’s worked for rapid cycling, but only when everything else didn’t.
- As with epilepsy, one of Keppra’s best features is that if you stop taking it, Keppra tends to work just as well if you stop it and restart it. So if you were crazy and thought you were cured, or because your manias are seasonal and you don’t need a potent anti-manic certain times of the year, Keppra has its place in the bipolar pharmacopeia.
- Migraines, both in adults and kids.
- IV Keppra is good for status migrainosus - migraines that last for more than 72 fucking hours.
- Neuropathic pain, including:
- chronic pain in multiple sclerosis
- trigeminal neuralgia
- And as an adjunctive analgesic, along with traditional opiods, in neoplastic plexopathies -not like I have any idea what that is, other than it hurts a lot and it’s involved with cancer.
- The data are mixed when it comes to Keppra and anxiety disorders. In this study it looks pretty good, while in this study it’s just so-so, and in this study the placebo worked better.
- Like all anticonvulsants, Keppra is being tested as a means to get clean when hooked on other drugs. Alcohol seems to be the most promising, although the data are mixed.
- And Keppra is used successfully for all sorts of movement disorders:
- It works well for antipsychotics-resistant Tourette Syndrome
- But when it comes to Tourette Syndrome in general, the data are mixed.
- Along the same lines, Keppra seems to be great for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. There are a dozen small studies supporting that, but nothing about Parkinson’s itself.
- Tardive dyskinesia.
- Meige’s syndrome.
- Generalized dystonia.
- Dyskinetic cerebral palsy and hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
- Huntington disease, but watch out! Keppra has caused dyskinesias in people with Huntington’s.
Figure it out? The magic word: refractory. Keppra is the go-to drug when nothing else will work, or whatever you take barely works.
See the page on Keppra-XR’s efficacy for details on the likelihood Keppra-XR will work for approved indications and off-label uses.
Just because a medication is approved or commonly prescribed for a particular condition doesn’t necessarily mean you should be taking it for that condition. There could be a drug that might be better to try first, or at least talk to your doctor about trying first, such as Topamax instead of Depakote as a daily med to prevent migraines (and Topamax has its own reasons why you should and should not take it). Or the condition you have isn’t bad enough to warrant medication at all. E.g. any antidepressant if you’re not so depressed that you can function at relatively the same level as you do when you’re not depressed.
4. When/Why You Should Take Keppra-XR
- Your neurologist said so.
- You have brain cancer.
- Your liver is next to useless.
- All the usual meds failed or barely work.
5. When/Why You Should NOT Take Keppra-XR
- You’re currently severely depressed.
- You have a history of psychosis (One off-label use nobody dares try: Keppra for schizophrenia).
- Especially if you have a history of psychosis caused by AEDs.
- Extra especially if the psychosis happened after your seizures were under control.
When all else fails and you’ve run out of other options, Keppra-XR may be your last best chance at treating an obscure or treatment-resistant condition.
Be careful! Otherwise safe meds can be downright dangerous when used for some things.
6. Less Common/Experimental Off-Label Uses of Keppra-XR
- Keppra has been successfully used for Landau-Kleffner syndrome.
- Keppra is OK for Unverricht-Lundborg disease.
- Eyelid myoclonia with absences (Jeavons syndrome). While the data are mixed with this one, when you’ve got an obscure and difficult-to-treat condition, anything that works for somebody is probably worth trying.
- Angelman syndrome. Including when the kid goes into nonconvulsive status epilepticus.
- premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Although this is where an abstract is nowhere near enough data. Sure, it worked great for 6 out of 7 women, but what about the other 116 who were screened out of the study in the first place?
- Stiff person syndrome.
- Mad Cow Disease! Really. To control the myoclonic seizures associated with Creutzfeldt-Jakob. Here it is again, although that one is just bitching about vomiting. Neither has an abstract.
- Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. This is a problem carriers of Fragile X syndrome have, not the people with it.
- Hemifacial spasm.
7. Failed Off-Label Uses
Alas, Keppra doesn’t work for absolutely everything. There are some things it can’t deal with.
- Essential tremor - You know it’s an epic fail when they pull the plug on a study after it did absolutely jack shit for 15 out of a planned 45 people, before they could find the remaining 30. The results from this study are only slightly less bad, but in Spanish.
- Chronic daily headache
- spinal cord injury pain
- The data are mixed with autism. It didn’t help with anything this study was looking at, and only some of the things this study was looking at.
- Behavioral and cognitive side effects from prednisone therapy. Hulk still smash. And from personal experience - Keppra doesn’t do squat to counter any of these types of side effects from steroid therapy or similar symptoms from the condition it’s treating.
- Postmastectomy pain syndrome. Keppra is great for brain cancer, but absolutely worthless for boob cancer.
- Charles Bonnet syndrome. Stick with Tegretol or Depakote, a Keppra just makes it worse.
8. Potentially Dangerous Off-Label Uses
‹ Brand and Generic Availability | Keppra-XR Index | How Long & How Likely To Work, Comparisons with Other Meds ›
Crazy Meds Comprehensive Keppra-XR pages
1 Before Cymbalta (duloxetine) was approved as an antidepressant in the US it was already approved in the EU, but only for stress urinary incontinence and sold under the trade name Yentreve. Duloxetine is now sold in the EU as an antidepressant under the trade name Cymbalta.
A better known, if slightly different example is bupropion. According to the 2007 edition of Mosby's Drug Consult, in the US, Canada and Singapore you can get both Wellbutrin (bupropion) as an antidepressant or as Zyban (bupropion) to stop smoking. In Korea, Thailand and most of South America (but not Brazil) you can get bupropion (under various trade names) only as an antidepressant. In Brazil, the EU & UK, Israel, India, Australia and New Zealand it's only available as Zyban to help you stop smoking.
Date created Tuesday, 04 October 2011 at 11:12:28 Page Creator: Last edited by: JerodPoore
Keppra-XR Approved and Off-label Uses by is copyright 2011
Page design and explanatory material by Jerod Poore, copyright © 2004 - 2012. All rights reserved.
Almost all of the material on this site is by Jerod Poore and is copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 Jerod Poore. Except, of course, the PI sheets - those are the property of the drug companies who developed the drugs the sheets are about - and any documents that are written by other people which may be posted to this site will remain the property of the original authors. You cannot reproduce this page or any other material on this site outside of the boundaries of fair use copying without the express permission of the copyright holder. That’s usually me, so just ask first. That means if want to print out a few pages to take to your doctor, therapist, counselor, support group, non-understanding family members or something like that - then that’s OK to just do. Go for it! Please. As long as you include this copyright notice and the following disclaimer, I’m usually cool with it.
All rights reserved. No warranty is expressed or implied in this information. Consult one or more doctors and/or pharmacists before taking, or changing how you take any neurological and/or psychiatric medication. Your mileage may vary. What happened to us won’t necessarily happen to you.
The information on Crazy Meds pertains to and is intended for adults. While some information about children and adolescents is occasionally presented (e.g. US FDA approvals), pediatric-specific data such as dosages, side effects, off-label applications, etc. are rarely included in the articles on drugs or discussed on the forum. If you are looking for information regarding meds for children you’ll have to go somewhere else.
Know your sources!
Nobody on this site is a doctor, therapist, or a pharmacist. We don’t portray them either here or on TV. Only doctors can diagnose and treat an illness. Some doctors tend to get pissed off by patients who know too much about medications, so tread lightly when and where appropriate. Diagnosing yourself from a website is like defending yourself in court, you suddenly have a fool for a doctor. Don’t be a cyberchondriac, thinking you have every disease you see a website about, or that you’ll get every side effect from every medication1. Self-prescribing is as dangerous as buying meds from fraudulent online pharmacies that promise you medications without prescriptions.
All information on this site has been obtained through our personal experience and the experiences family, friends, what people have reported on various reputable sites all over teh intergoogles, the medications’ product information / summary of product characteristic (PI/SPC) sheets, and from sources that are referenced throughout the site. As such the information presented here is not intended as a substitute for real medical advice from your real doctor, just a compliment to it. You should never, ever, replace what a real doctor tells you with something from a website on the Internet. The farthest you should ever take it is getting a second opinion from another real doctor. Educate yourself - always read the PI/SPC sheet or patient information leaflet (PIL) that comes with your medications and never ever throw them away.
Crazy Meds is not responsible for the content of sites we provide links to. We like them, or they’re paid advertisements, or they’re something else we think you should read to help you make an informed decision about a particular med. Sometimes they’re more than one of those things. But what’s on those sites is their business, not ours.
Very little information about visitors to this site is collected or saved. From time to time I look at search terms used and which pages they bring up in an effort to make the information I present more relevant. And the country of origin, just because I’m geeky like that. That’s about it. Depending on how you feel about Schrodinger, our privacy policy should either assuage or exacerbate your paranoia.
All brand names of the drugs listed in this site are the trademarks of the companies named on the PI/SPC sheet associated with the medication, sometimes on the pages about the drugs, even though those companies may have been acquired by other companies who may or may not be listed in this site by the time you read this. Or the rights to the drug were sold to another company. And any or all of the companies involved may have changed their names.
Crazy Meds is optimized for the browser you’re not using on the platform you wish you had. Between you and me, it all looks a lot cleaner using Firefox or Safari, which is what a plurality of visitors use. And I’m running Windows XP3. On a computer that sits on top of my desk. With a 23 inch monitor. Hey, at least you can make the text larger or smaller by clicking on the + or - buttons in the upper right hand corner. If you have Java enabled. Like 99% of the websites on the planet, Crazy Meds is hosted on domain running an open source operating system with a variety of open source applications, including the software used to display what you’ve been reading. As such Crazy Meds is not responsible for whatever weird shit your browser does or does not do when you read this site2.
No neurologists, psychiatrists, therapists or pharmacists were harmed in the production of this website. Use only as directed. Void where prohibited. Contains nuts. Certain restrictions may apply. All data are subject to availability. Not available on all mobile devices or in all dimensions of reality.
‘Everything is true, nothing is permitted.’ - Jerod Poore
1 While there are plenty of books to help you with hypochondria, for some reason there’s not much in the way of websites. Then again, staying off of the Internet is a large part of curing/managing the disorder.
2 Have I mentioned how open source operating systems for commercial applications is one of the dumbest ideas in the history of dumb ideas?
[begin rant] I rent a dedicated server for Crazy Meds. It’s sitting on a rack somewhere in Southern California along with a bunch of other servers that other people have rented. The hardware is identical, but no two machines have exactly the same operating systems. I don’t even need to see what is on any of the others to know this. If somebody got their server at the exact same time, with the exact same features as I did, I’m confident that there would be noticeable differences in some aspects of the operating systems. So what does this mean? For one thing it means that no two computers in the same office of a single company have the same operating system, and the techs can spend hours figuring out what the fuck the problem could be based on that alone. It also means that application software like IP board that runs the forum here has to have so many fucking user-configurable bells and whistles that even when I read the manual I can’t find every setting, or every location that every flag needs to be set in order for a feature to run the way I want it to run. And in the real world it means you can get an MBA not only with an emphasis on resource planning, but with an emphasis on using SAP - a piece of software so complex there are now college programs on how to use it. You might think, “But don’t people learn how to use Photoshop or Adobe Illustrator in college?” Sure, in order to create stuff. And in a way you’re creating stuff with SAP. But do you get a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree with an emphasis on Photoshop?
Back in the Big Iron Age the operating systems were proprietary, and every computer that took up an entire room with a raised floor and HVAC system, and had less storage and processing power than an iPhone, had the same operating system as every other one, give or take a release level. But when a company bought application software like SAP, they also got the source code, which was usually documented and written in a way to make it easy to modify the hell out of it. Why? Because accounting principles may be the same the world over, and tax laws the same across each country and state, but no two companies have the same format for their reports, invoices, purchase orders and so forth. Standards existed and were universally ignored. If something went wrong it went wrong the same way for everyone, and was easy to track down. People didn’t need to take a college course to learn how to use a piece of software.
I’m not against the open source concept entirely. Back then all the programmers read the same magazines, so we all had the same homebrew utilities. We even had the forerunner to QR Code to scan the longer source code. Software vendors and computer manufacturers sponsored conventions so we could, among other things, swap recipes for such add-ons and utilities. While those things would make our lives easier, they had nothing to do with critical functions of the operating system. Unless badly implemented they would rarely cause key application software to crash and burn. Whereas today, with open source everything, who the hell knows what could be responsible some part of a system failing. [/end rant]




