When To See Another Therapist? How to decide
#1
Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:33 PM
#2
Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:48 PM
Current status with current therapist (stale and not going anywhere, uncomfortable, etc.) Plus I"d also consider how long it will take to get settled with a new one and all that.
Some people have said that they just got to a point in therapy where they needed some new blood and it kick started things again. It took me so damned long to build a decent relationship with my current therapist, I'm not sure I'm ever going to be up for the idea of starting all over again.
"Ah, war. God's way of making Americans learn geography." ~ Jon Stewart, The Daily Show
Dx: Bipolar Something (depends on who you ask...), ADHD- inattentive type, some anxiety stuff, PTSD
Alt Dx: "Nutty as squirrel poo." (quote from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows)
Rx:Seroquel- 150 mg at bedtime, Klonopin .5 mg prn, Adderall 15 mgs/prn
Favorite things: Harry Potter, Seroquel, flannel sheets, House, Lost, The Office, my Tempur-pedic bed, pajama pants, massage, music, reading, Coca-Cola, Starbucks, sleep
Dr. Wilson: Beauty often seduces us on the road to truth.
Dr. Gregory House: And triteness kicks us in the nads.
#3
Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:48 PM
The predominant issues -
Whether you are making progress or not
Whether or not you find yourself making the choices you want to be making
Is there a belief that, if you changed therapists, you would be doing something differently that you're not doing now? Really? What is that something? How do you see the change in therapist affecting that?
Why the switch now?
What about the relationship disturbs you? Is it transference (in which the therapist reminds you of someone) (brief description of transference!), or does it feel unsafe? Those are two very different things.
If it's an issue of frustration with failure to progress, has it been discussed with the therapist?
Science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. It is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good. --Terry Pratchett
#4
Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:32 PM
This post has been edited by Anastacia: 27 September 2007 - 08:34 PM
#5
Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:46 PM
Are you going for a straight psychodynamic 'analysis,' or something more goal-oriented?
It is not unreasonable to go through little cycles of therapy - set a cluster of goals, get there, do something else, come back if needed.
I have a pretty strong cognitive-behavioral and brief therapy bent, so I'm biased, of course. I recognize there's more than just CBT out there, but endless psychodynamic work seems... endless.
This is sort of interesting; more oriented to people who are feeling ready to 'graduate,' but you might find something applicable.
Rapport with the therapist is a huge predictor of therapeutic success. So that is something to consider. (Not liking the thp, but rapport. Doesn't sound like you have either here.)
Science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. It is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good. --Terry Pratchett
#6
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:53 PM
Thanks for the article. Yes, there's a little that is applicable.
This post has been edited by Anastacia: 27 September 2007 - 09:54 PM
#7
Posted 28 September 2007 - 12:13 PM
There are still (IMO) too many therapists who want to work only on "family of origin" concerns and relate all current problems to what happened BACK THEN as though there is a logical connection if we can only stick with it long enough to find it. I have also found therapists who just don't have skills to do the kind of BP problem-solving that comes up with an illness that affects so many areas of function and competence.
In the past I'd stick with a TDoc for quite a while even if nothing positive was happening. For a long time I lacked the strength and courage to terminate therapists because of my dependence and the belief that all therapists are equally qualified and had more power than I had. I didn't yet know how to demand what was needed and cut loose any therapist who didn't produce or meet my needs.
It's important to ask ourselves what we want from therapy and why we are entering into it. I do think bad therapy can be harmful, and we owe it to ourselves to seek out the best.
#8
Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:33 PM
#9
Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:52 PM
I know this is a stretch, but have you considered looking for a bipolar group therapy? My therapist has been pushing me towards group for about a year now, and his whole argument is that you can learn a lot from people going through the same thing. (Really? maybe someone should start a website like that. Oh wait... someone did...) It's just a thought, but I find it easier to take advice from people that have been there.
"Ah, war. God's way of making Americans learn geography." ~ Jon Stewart, The Daily Show
Dx: Bipolar Something (depends on who you ask...), ADHD- inattentive type, some anxiety stuff, PTSD
Alt Dx: "Nutty as squirrel poo." (quote from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows)
Rx:Seroquel- 150 mg at bedtime, Klonopin .5 mg prn, Adderall 15 mgs/prn
Favorite things: Harry Potter, Seroquel, flannel sheets, House, Lost, The Office, my Tempur-pedic bed, pajama pants, massage, music, reading, Coca-Cola, Starbucks, sleep
Dr. Wilson: Beauty often seduces us on the road to truth.
Dr. Gregory House: And triteness kicks us in the nads.
#10
Posted 28 September 2007 - 03:11 PM
Before I saw these two, I figured the grief-tdoc would be more suited for people with less chronic or more narrowly specific problems, but now I'm really not sure. As for the analyst, it's probably natural to feel that hardly anything was done in the first session, given the glacial nature of the method. So this thread has brought up some interesting points for me to consider.
How long should I take to decide between the two? (if it's not too big of a threadjack - if it is, just ignore)
a.m. Rx: Effexor XR
p.m. Rx: Mirapex 0.25mg (for restless legs), Zegerid (for p.m. GERD), Topamax 25mg
#11
Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:16 PM
milkchan, on Fri 28 September 2007 15:11:37 GMT +0000, said:
Before I saw these two, I figured the grief-tdoc would be more suited for people with less chronic or more narrowly specific problems, but now I'm really not sure. As for the analyst, it's probably natural to feel that hardly anything was done in the first session, given the glacial nature of the method. So this thread has brought up some interesting points for me to consider.
How long should I take to decide between the two? (if it's not too big of a threadjack - if it is, just ignore)
Well, since I started the thread, we'll make the threadjack completely sanctioned.
Take as long as you need to figure out which one your gut says is not full of shit, respects you for who you are, doesn't want to make you be her concept of who you should be, doesn't use phrases like "you should be," and most importantly, that you can develop a real bond of trust. As frustrated with therapy that I might be right now, I do recognize that the relationship with the therapist is just as, if not more, important than whatever form of therapy is used. If it's a real draw, I'd go with the grief counselor simply because it's a shorter type of therapy. If it turns out to not do it, then go for the long road - you won't be far behind where you would have gotten, anyway. Okay, that was flip. There are benefits to doing analytic therapy. One being that it is largely driven by you.
#12
Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:48 PM
Verity, yes, I've thought about a bipolar support group. I was wait listed with my HMO. The only thing I know of now is 50 miles away. I also have this picture in my head of a bunch BPIs much younger than me, which isn't exactly what I'd be seeking.
I think I'll post a separate thread on books on bipolar to give a therapist.
This post has been edited by Anastacia: 28 September 2007 - 06:50 PM
#13
Posted 28 September 2007 - 08:55 PM
Anastacia, on Fri 28 September 2007 18:48:42 GMT +0000, said:
I'm sure you're aware (it was posted quite a bit on the old site) of the DBSA bipolar support groups. If you go to www.dbsalliance.org you can search for a group in your area. This is no guarantee you'll like the group or get anything out of it, but it is a resource. BTW, I attended one several years ago and group members ranged in age from mid-teens to 65+. It was truly a mix of ages, perspectives and life experiences. Unfortunately, BP is no respecter of age; often aging brings its share of unanticipated problems.
Another online "find a therapist" resource is:
www.therapists.psychologytoday.com
Lots of therapists advertise on this site. Most provide photos, detailed practice info., education/training, and some list private client GROUPS in their area of expertise. Again, no guarantees implied. One good thing about it is that you can zero in on professionals in your geographic area.
#14
Posted 28 September 2007 - 09:05 PM
martasi2, on Fri 28 September 2007 20:55:26 GMT +0000, said:
The one 50 miles away is DBSA. That's encouraging to hear about the age range. One of these weekends I'll go check it out, but the distance and travel time involved is a bit much.
Thanks for the link. I can match those on my insurance to what pops up at the site. Only a handful of psychologists in my area are covered, but there are lots and lots of MFTs.
This post has been edited by Anastacia: 28 September 2007 - 09:05 PM
#15
Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:04 AM
#16
Posted 19 December 2007 - 09:05 AM
#17
Posted 19 December 2007 - 10:13 AM
- ← Previous Topic
- Talk Therapy for Bipolar Disorder: Just Don't Tell Us About Your Parents!
- Next Topic →
Share this topic:
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help














